Unless patients have a personal Dr on-call, odds are that
they spend too much time in a waiting room. According to a recent survey;
·
85% of patients now say they have to wait
as long as 30 minutes past their appointment time to see their Dr
·
63% call this the most stressful
aspect of the visit
·
Some 20% of patients say that long wait times
have caused them to switch Drs
·
Longer wait times translate directly into lower
ratings for Drs on review sites
·
Longer waits lower the chances that a patient
will recommend the practice to others
These are serious business risks for a Dr trying to run a
practice. Even worse, research also finds that a history of long waits at a
particular Dr's clinic leads to no-shows; 30% of patients have decided to
leave the appointment altogether because of long waits. Despite the
challenges involved in running a practice and coordinating the many moving
parts involved in improving practice flow efficiency, technology and the use of
analytics can help practices make significant improvements.
When long waits cause patients to abandon their
appointments, the effects can go beyond customer satisfaction and
business-level concerns and actually start impacting patient outcomes. Imagine
the cascading effect that failed early detection of a health complication can
have. Even if the patient goes to see a new Dr immediately, that practitioner
is a new one who is just playing "catch-up" on the patient's medical history.
Fortunately, there are ways to try and shorten waiting room
times. There are administrative fixes like scheduling fewer patients, hiring
more clinic staff and adding more Drs to the practice. Some solutions involve
introducing new technology into the clinic and patient experience. But
the biggest potential driver of change is simply gathering data about the specific
dimensions of the problem so that you can fix it.
For example, researchers may have a pretty good idea how
long patients across the country are waiting. But what about in a specific clinic?
Learning the exact amount of time people wait in a specific clinic might
illuminate a trend, and maybe point to a practical solution. Research
indicates that patient satisfaction drops precipitously after the 20-minute mark. So, if a given clinic's wait time is within striking distance of 20 minutes,
this might be an achievable benchmark to strive for.
A second approach is to get more granular when it comes to how
patients are waiting. After all, not all waits are the same. Which stages of
the wait are taking the longest? Are there unnecessary delays or hurdles at
discrete points of the process that can be managed better? This is an instance
in which technology and analytics could break the bottlenecks. Another key
question is, "What kinds of visit types take the longest?" By breaking these out, practices
can employ strategies like staggering long-wait and short-wait patients,
resizing appointment slots to better "fit" a patient who is likely to take
longer, and even referring patients to other providers who have more capacity
at typical bottleneck times.
And in the big picture, what about simply taking a hard, statistics-driven look at what the longest wait times have in common? If it's not a specific stage of the process, or type of consultation, it might be a completely unpredicted unknown factor, such as time of day or the day of the week. For example, appointments toward the end of the day are the most likely to be delayed because of the snowballing of earlier delays or appointments running over. Likewise, studies have found that certain days, like Tuesday, are the most popular for scheduling appointments. In the past, gathering this kind of data would have been complex and error prone.
Today, however, medical clinics
can simply digitize their patient intake process and get all this data
automatically. Modern wait management technologies, for example, which enable
patients to get in line and wait virtually with their mobile devices or through
any other channel, can provide practices with tons of structured data
detailing—not just how long each patient had to wait at each stage of their
appointment, but other wait-related statistics too, such as what kind of visit
that patient was in for and which Dr and other staff members they interacted
with. With that kind of insight so readily available, the only thing left for
practices to do is to act on it. Practices that take time to parse data after
digitizing their patient intake and analyze it with the intent of using that
information to improve these practices have seen increases of:
·
20% in throughput, patient satisfaction scores
and demand
Let Expeditor show you how we help clinics capture, analyze,
and consult on the patient flow data in your practice. Simply fill out our Contact Us form and one
our Lean Consultants will show you how we have helped other clinics reach
upwards of:
·
50% reduction in wait and visit times, that's right…50%!
Remember that you can't manage what you don't measure!